Sunday, January 31, 2010

Japan not as worried about US Toyota recalls

TOKYO – American Toyota owners are understandably alarmed about ballooning recalls over faulty gas pedals and floor mats. In Japan, the automaker's home market, where there have been no such recalls, the reaction is — also understandably — muted.

Some of the same Toyota Motor Corp. models recalled in the U.S., Europe and China are on Japanese roads. But they use a different parts supplier than CTS Corp., the American parts-maker which has been rushing to fix the faulty parts behind the massive recalls.

Dealers in the U.S. are being deluged with queries from worried customers. For dealers in Japan, it's basically business as usual.

"Some of our customers express sympathy about Toyota's overseas problems," Naeko Kawamata, a saleswoman at a Tokyo Toyota dealer, said Saturday. "But we aren't getting queries on recalls."

So far, Toyota's reputation for quality is holding up in Japan. One factor in Toyota's favor is that Japanese often assume that Japan-made products are better than those made abroad — meaning that their Toyotas are safe.

"I think Toyota cars are very reliable," said Takashi Itoh, a photographer whose family members drive Toyota models.

"The cars being recalled in China and the U.S. aren't made in Japan. They were made there. Those kind of problems definitely won't happen in Japan," he said.

Some Japanese experts are optimistic the fallout from the U.S. woes will fade in a few months — as long as Toyota responds relatively quickly to fix the problem.

They see Toyota's troubles as having crept up because the automaker expanded too quickly over the last several years, making it difficult to duplicate the "Toyota Way," known for impeccable quality controls, in places that are quite different from Japan.

"Toyota appears to be trying to respond with care," said Hideaki Miyajima, a professor of business and economics at Tokyo's Waseda University.

"Toyota has grown to where it is now by sticking to safety standards. If it can overcome this problem, it can even make the experience a plus for its future fast cash online."

Overnight, President Akio Toyoda apologized for the worries the recalls caused Toyota owners.

At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, he told Japanese public broadcaster NHK, "I am very sorry that we are making our customers feel concerned."

"People can feel safe driving in the current situation," he added. "Please trust that we are responding so it will be even safer."

Toyota said it began shipping gas-pedal parts to its dealers Friday for use in fixing the millions of cars and trucks recalled because of accelerators that could become stuck.

Company spokesman Brian Lyons said he did not know when the parts would arrive or how long it would take the automaker to complete repairs on the 4.2 million vehicles worldwide covered by the recall. He said details of the fix will be announced next week.

After accounting for earlier recalls for floor mats and some vehicles being recalled more than once, the global recall amounts to more than 7 million vehicles, a staggering number.

Hidekai Homma, a Toyota official in Tokyo, said media reports giving that number as the equivalent of Toyota's annual vehicle sales are providing an exaggerated picture of the problem.

"We don't welcome this kind of thinking at all," he told The Associated Press. "No matter what, we believe we have responded speedily to a problem that has come up."

Consumer Reports, an influential U.S. publication, has suspended its "recommended" status for the eight recalled models, dealing another blow to the Japanese automaker's reputation in the U.S.

Toyota stopped selling the eight U.S. models, including the top-selling Camry, on Tuesday. It also announced that it will stop building them in the U.S. until the problem is fixed.

___

AP Auto Writer Tom Krisher in Detroit contributed to this report.

Japan not as worried about US Toyota recalls

Friday, January 29, 2010

Beef Bowl Economics

.

TOKYO — The broiled meat is tender and the rice is silky-smooth at beef bowl restaurants. But as Japan’s economic recovery falters, beef bowls have come to symbolize one of its most pressing woes: deflation.

Japan’s big three beef bowl restaurant chains, the country’s answer to hamburger giants like McDonald’s, are in a price war. It is a sign, many people say, of the dire state of Japan’s economy that even dirt-cheap beef bowl restaurants must slash their already low prices to keep customers.

The battle has also come to epitomize a destructive pattern repeated across Japan’s economy. By cutting prices hastily and aggressively to attract consumers, critics say, restaurants decimate profits, squeeze workers’ pay and drive the weak out of business — a deflationary cycle that threatens the nation’s economy.

“These cutthroat price wars could usher in another recessionary hell,” the influential economist Noriko Hama wrote in a magazine article that has won much attention. “If we all got used to spending just 250 yen for every meal, then meals priced respectably will soon become too expensive,” she said. “When you buy something cheap, you lower the value of your own life.”

Deflation — defined as a decline in the prices of goods and services — is back in Japan as it struggles to shake off the effects of its worst recession since World War II.

While prices have fallen elsewhere during the global economic crisis, deflation has been the most persistent here: consumer prices among industrialized economies rose by a robust 1.3 percent in the year to November, but fell 1.9 percent in Japan.

In the decline, companies that undercut rivals too aggressively are being chastised as reckless at best, or as traitors undermining the country’s recovery at worst. Every markdown of beef bowl prices by the big three restaurants — Sukiya, Yoshinoya and Matsuya — has been promptly broadcast by the national news media here.

Japan has reason to be worried. Deflation hampered Japan from the mid-1990s, after the collapse of its bubble economy, to at least 2005. Households held back spending on big-ticket goods, knowing they would only get cheaper. Companies were unsure of how much to invest. At the time, the three beef bowl chains were in a similar price war.

Still, government officials back then emphasized the supposed benefits of deflation; falling prices were good for households, they said. Others said deflation would help restructure the economy by weeding out weak companies.

But the drawn-out deflationary cycle weighed heavily on Japan’s recovery. Apart from putting a damper on consumption and investment, asset deflation ravaged the country’s banks and shut out new businesses from credit.

Now that deflation is back, Japan is wary. Unemployment remains near record highs, and wages are falling. Mounting public debt is also a problem, causing Standard & Poor’s on Tuesday to cut its outlook for Japan’s sovereign rating for the first time since 2002. Japan must do more to lift its economy out of deflation and bolster long-term growth, S.& P. said.

Moreover, the population is shrinking, making demand inherently weak. Economists say Japan’s economy is saddled with a 35 trillion yen, or $388 billion, “demand gap,” or almost 7 percent of the country’s economic output.

“With supply continuing to exceed demand by a massive margin, deflationary expectations are proving very difficult to shake,” said Ryutaro Kono, an economist at BNP Paribas in Tokyo. “Households have been tightening their purse strings as the income outlook looks increasingly bleak, and we believe firms will continue to respond by lowering prices.”

Matsuya, the smallest of the three chains, set off the price war by cutting the price of its standard beef bowl to 320 yen, or $3.55, from 380 yen in early December. The market leader, Sukiya, followed suit that month, lowering its price to 280 yen, from 330 yen.

This month, the No. 2 beef bowl chain, Yoshinoya, lowered the price of its beef bowl to 300 yen, from 380 yen, though it says the cut is temporary. A smaller chain, Nakau, has also lowered prices.

The restaurant chains insist they have not downsized their portions, and will make up for cheaper prices by raising efficiency.

“We don’t consider this a price cut. We’ve simply set a new price,” said Naoki Fujita at Zensho, which runs the Sukiya chain faxless payday loans. “With incomes falling, we needed to figure out what would be a reasonable price,” he said. “We hope customers who came every week will now come twice a week.”

In a sense, the beef bowl has always been about low prices. Yoshinoya, the beef bowl pioneer with about 1,560 stores in Japan and overseas, helped bring beef to the Japanese working class with its first restaurant in the Nihonbashi district of Tokyo in 1899.

Though beef was a delicacy at the time, Eikichi Matsuda, the Yoshinoya founder, kept prices cheap by buying in bulk, and serving as many customers as possible from his tiny stall. Speed and efficiency reigned, with workers trained to start preparing a bowl even before a customer sat down.

The same principles still apply at Yoshinoya. At a branch in central Tokyo, servers rarely take more than a minute to fill an order. The average customer spends just 7.5 minutes on a meal, and a small restaurant can serve more than 3,000 customers a day.

But forced to sell at ever-lower prices — and hurt by lower-priced competitors — making a profit has been increasingly difficult. The company suffered a 2.3 billion yen net loss in the nine months to November, and the next month, before Yoshinoya slashed prices, its sales slumped 22.2 percent. In contrast, sales at Sukiya, which serves up the cheapest beef bowl, surged 15.9 percent that month from the previous year.

Yoshinoya is not considering further price cuts. Squeezing out more savings is “like wringing a dry towel,” said a spokesman, Haruhiko Kizu.

Meanwhile, labor disputes at Sukiya show how falling prices and revenue can quickly hurt workers. A string of former workers have sued the chain over withholding overtime pay. Sukiya denies the accusations.

Other companies have been harshly criticized for slashing prices. Fast Retailing, the company behind the fast-growing Uniqlo brand, has garnered as much disapproval as awe for selling jeans as low as 990 yen. McDonald’s, on the other hand, has won kudos for resisting bargain basement prices by introducing a series of big “American-style” burgers for more than 400 yen, considered expensive in today’s Japan.

“Some Japanese companies are waging such reckless price wars, they’re wringing their own necks,” said Masamitsu Sakurai, who heads the influential business lobby Keizai Doyukai. “Companies need to be more creative. They should come up with products that add value.”

Economists say it is absurd to blame individual companies for Japan’s deflation. “For prices to fall during an economic downturn is natural. That stimulates demand and facilitates an eventual recovery,” said Takuji Aida, chief economist for UBS in Tokyo. “But this mechanism doesn’t work when there is such a big demand shortfall.”

The government has vowed to lift household incomes through a series of subsidies, including new cash payments to families with small children. But the scale of government payments — 2.3 trillion yen in the case of the child subsidies — is hardly enough to fill the nation’s huge demand shortfall. With interest rates close to zero, Japan also has few options left in monetary policy.

In the meantime, cutthroat price battles are already driving laggards out of business. Wendy’s, the American burger chain, left Japan on Dec. 31.

It is not surprising, considering the competition. A mere stone’s throw from Tokyo’s celebrated Ginza district is Shokuan, the kind of restaurant that is undercutting everyone.

Shokuan, which has no chairs nor table service, is a cluster of beer vending machines huddled under the train tracks. A man behind a tiny counter sells dirt-cheap morsels: fish sausages for 50 yen, prawn crackers for 60 yen, canned yakitori for 160 yen. Many days of the week, Shokuan is spilling over with customers.

“I don’t think there’s anything around here cheaper than this. That’s why I started to come,” said Yasunori Miura, a manufacturing company employee and a recent regular. “This here,” he said, pointing to his fish sausage, “is deflation.”

Makiko Inoue contributed reporting.

Beef Bowl Economics

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Disappointing Economic Data Push Markets Lower

Shares on Wall Street slipped in early trading Thursday as upbeat earnings failed to offset uncertainty still swirling around government involvement in the market and disappointing jobless and durable goods orders reports.

Markets also declined in Europe after shares finished higher in Asia.

Politics, not the economy, had been dictating trading over the last week. Concerns about President Obama’s plan to overhaul banking regulation and restrict trading at large financial institutions spooked the market. The possibility that the Federal Reserve Board chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, would not be confirmed for a second term had investors on edge, though those worries have subsided. Stocks have declined five of the last eight days.

During his State of the Union address Wednesday night, Mr. Obama avoided talking about the banking overhaul plan. Uncertainty over details of how that plan might be enacted and how strong trading restrictions would be had helped push the market to its worst three-day stretch since stocks bottomed last March.

Focus on the economy is creeping back to the forefront. The Fed said Wednesday afternoon it would keep interest rates at historic lows and the economy was showing signs of improvement. That helped stocks rally late in the day.

Investors welcomed a new round of earnings Thursday that showed signs of a strengthening economy. However, the Labor Department said weekly jobless claims fell by less than expected last week and the Commerce Department reported durable goods orders did not rise as fast as anticipated last month, providing a reminder the economic recovery will probably be slow.

In late morning trading, the Dow Jones industrial average fell 167.77 points, or 1.6 percent. The Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index fell 17.84, or 1.6 percent while the Nasdaq declined 51.98 points, or 2.3 percent.

In London, the FTSE 100 index was down 24.41 points, or 0.5 percent, at 5,193 easy payday loans.06 while Germany’s DAX fell 52.81 points, or 0.9 percent, to 5,590.39 The CAC-40 in France was 37.15 points, or 1 percent, lower at 3,723.65.

In Japan, the Nikkei 225 stock average rose 162.21 points, or 1.6 percent, to 10,414.29 and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng added 323.30 points, or 1.6 percent, 20,356.37. Shanghai’s market was up 0.3 percent, Australia added 0.6 percent and India’s index ticked up 0.1 percent.

The Ford Motor Company said it recorded a profitin 2009 — its first annual profit in four years. The auto maker, which avoided bankruptcy and government bailout money, said it expected to again be profitable in 2010.

The consumer products makers, Colgate-Palmolive, and the Procter & Gamble Company both said quarterly sales improved as consumers continue to spend on necessary goods. The two reports topped analysts’ expectations.

The pharmaceutical company, Eli Lilly & Company, recorded a profit during the fourth quarter as sales of its two top-selling drugs rose sharply.

And AT&T’s profit was in line with expectations, though the telecommunications company added a near-record 2.7 million wireless customers.

New requests for unemployment benefits fell modestly, dropping to 470,000 last week. Economists polled by Thomson Reuters had been expecting a bigger drop to 450,000 new unemployment filings.

Orders to American factories for big-ticket manufactured goods rose less than expected in December, increasing just 0.3 percent. Economists had been expecting a 2 percent increase in orders.

For all of 2009, durable goods orders — items expected to last at least three years — tumbled 20.2 percent. It was the largest drop on records that go back to 1992.

Disappointing Economic Data Push Markets Lower

Hot News: Oil near $74 in Asia on renewed US growth optimism

Monday, January 25, 2010

Existing Home Sales Drop More Than Forecast

Home sales slid in December, putting at least a temporary end to a gradually improving picture for real estate and deepening questions about the market’s viability.

Sales of existing homes in December fell 16.7 percent from November to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.45 million units, the National Association of Realtors said Monday.

That was the lowest annual rate since August, although still 15 percent higher than December 2008.

A government tax credit has been distorting the market recently. In November, when fears of the credit’s expiration compelled people to buy, home sales rose more than expected to an annual rate of 6.54 million.

The credit was ultimately extended by Congress but the urgency is gone, at least for the moment.

“We’ll likely have another surge in the spring as home buyers take advantage of the extended and expanded tax credit,” the association’s chief economist, Lawrence Yun, said in a statement.

Analysts had been expecting a weak number, calling for an average drop of about 11 percent. An index that tracks pending home deals, released at the beginning of January, was down 16 percent advanced payday loan. Most pending deals become final in six weeks or two months.

The number of homes on the market is continuing to fall, dropping to 3.29 million homes. But since sales fell even faster, the supply on the market rose to 7.2 months in December from 6.5 months in November. Larger inventories often anticipate a drop in prices.

The real estate association said that 2009 was the first year since 2005 to record an annual sales gain. Sales in 2009 were up 4.9 percent from 2008.

The association said that median home price rose 1.4 percent in December to $177,500.

With the drop in sales, Tuesday’s release of the Case-Shiller home price data for November will be watched even more closely than usual. After a summer and fall of modest improvement, analysts are expecting the results to be unchanged at best from the previous month.

Existing Home Sales Drop More Than Forecast

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Chuck Jaffe: ETFs vs. mutual funds? Thats not the point

BOSTON (MarketWatch) -- It was an ordinary press release that was largely ignored by the media, but the recent announcement of a new trade group for the exchange-traded fund industry sends a clear signal about what's next in the evolution of ETFs and how they're viewed by the public.

The new ETF Council Inc. is a non-profit trade association for an $800 billion sub-segment of the fund industry. The Council is being formed by Irving Strauss, the most veteran media maven in the industry, a sprightly 89-year-old who is no stranger to building an industry group from an emerging idea.

Investment strategies for 2010

Oscar Schafer, managing partner at O.S.S. Capital Management and Barron's Roundtable members, sees inexpensive opportunities in the market.

A half century ago, Strauss created an organization that morphed its way through several different identities, but which acted as the trade association for no-load mutual funds. At the time, the public was not particularly knowledgeable about funds, and was under the impression that issues sold without a sales charge must be missing something.

Over time, the group splintered, with much of the focus changing from investing directly and without sales charges to investing smart and with a close eye on costs. The Mutual Fund Education Alliance that grew from that effort is a coalition of funds that continues its efforts to make investors smarter. The last incarnation of Strauss' original group, the 100% No-Load Mutual Fund Council, disbanded in May 2000.

Over the years, however, the public perception of the argument changed. At first, the group tried to convince consumers there was nothing wrong with funds that had no sales charges. Then, it became that funds without sales charges were better than funds with sales loads. Ultimately, the public recognized that the structure of sales charges is less important than the quality of investment management, and that total costs -- whether they come in loads, expense ratios or fees -- are more important than any specific type of cost.

ETFs are mutual funds

Fast-forward to the present-day situation with exchange-traded funds.

ETFs are mutual funds that trade like stocks. Rather than having all transactions made at the daily closing price, as happens with the vast majority of traditional funds, an ETF can be traded moment by moment. The build-out of the ETF business started with index funds, then went to leveraged index funds -- where the fund is built to deliver two or more times the daily return, or the inverse of the daily move -- and has recently added actively managed funds. (By comparison, the traditional fund world started with active management and didn't have indexing for about 50 years, and then added leveraged funds in the last decade, as ETFs were emerging savings account payday loans.)

The indexed varieties of ETF have some cost and tax advantages over traditional funds, but they can also have some purchase hardships for the long-term regular investor. Where a consumer can plow, say, $100 a month into their traditional fund, they would pay brokerage commissions to make the move with ETFs; even cheap trades add up when the deposits are small, eroding the cost benefits.

The "fund or ETF" question facing investors has become a debate.

"The ETF industry doesn't need to pick a fight against funds, but it does need to educate the public to what ETFs are all about," Strauss said. "To this point, the industry has been using the easy ideas, but now is the time when people will decide if they want traditional funds, ETFs or both."

In short, this is about to become the next "load/no-load" debate, an off-topic discussion for most investors, who should instead be focused on buying the best investment structure and management for their needs.

These days, it's easy to find message boards and chat rooms where people say things like "Why use mutual funds when you can buy ETFs?" The truth, of course, is that an ETF is a mutual fund built on a different chassis. Actively managed ETFs will have all of the same pitfalls as an actively managed traditional fund, just with a different structure.

And just as studies showed that total costs mattered more than load structure, so must investors recognize that ETFs are only better when they are based on superior investment strategy. Even Strauss, now an ETF advocate, acknowledges that up to this point the ordinary investor has been "buying ETFs because they think they're better, so they will buy the East Afghanistan Lamb's Wool fund just because it's an ETF.

"It's better for everyone, including the ETF companies, if investors figure out how an ETF can really help them," Strauss said.

In short, the new trade group is about marketing. Just as the 100% No-Load Mutual Fund Council was for funds that wanted to differentiate themselves from the rest of the industry, so the ETF firms see some benefit from having a group where they are featured, rather than being just a part of the broader interests of the Investment Company Institute, the mutual-fund company trade association.

As the ETF world looks increasingly like the traditional fund part of the industry, let's hope investors will be able to see past the hype and remember that the underlying investments and management philosophy will always be the most important considerations in picking fund, no matter the structure.

Chuck Jaffe: ETFs vs. mutual funds? That's not the point

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Reid, Bernanke meet; vote on Fed chief pending

WASHINGTON – Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid met on Thursday to talk about ways to strengthen the economy, spur more lending by banks and curb home foreclosures.

The meeting comes as Bernanke waits for what promises to be a contentious vote in the Senate on his nomination to run the nation's central bank for another four years. A vote still hasn't been set. Officials at one time had hoped it would come this week. Bernanke's term expires on Jan. 31.

"I believe more pressure needs to be applied to banks to lend money to small businesses and keep more Americans in their homes," Reid, D-Nev., said after his meeting with Bernanke.

Just days after losing their filibuster-proof Senate majority in a Massachusetts special election, Senate Democrats are searching for how to defuse voter angst over the sluggish economy and high unemployment before November's elections.

Although Bernanke, 56, should have enough votes in the Senate to win a second term, some lawmakers have lined up against him used car loans. They blame him for not spotting problems that led to the financial crisis, failing to protect consumers and supporting Wall Street bailouts.

So dissatisfied by the bailouts, Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent liberal from Vermont, wants to block Bernanke's confirmation with a filibuster on the Senate floor. He has placed a "hold" on the nomination, meaning it will require a super-majority of 60 votes to confirm Bernanke. Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky., says he oppose Bernanke's quest for a second term.

When the full Senate took up Bernanke's nomination to be Fed chief four years ago, only one senator — Bunning — opposed him.

Reid, Bernanke meet; vote on Fed chief pending

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Personal Finance Daily: From IRAs to credit cards, proceed with caution

Don't miss these top stories:

12 Roth conversion pitfalls

Credit-card issuers skirt new rules

More people expected to remodel in 2010

Average home size is shrinking

These days, with financial-services firms trumpeting the news on billboards, online and in ads everywhere, it's impossible to forget that as of Jan. 1 people of any income level can convert their regular IRAs to Roths. But just because something's possible doesn't mean it's right for you.

As Robert Powell details in his column today, there are plenty of traps to the conversion process, not a few of them driven by the fact that converting means taking income from your IRA. That temporary income spike may hit you in various unexpected ways (for instance, if you're receiving Social Security benefits, be careful).

Speaking of unexpected surprises, have you looked at your credit-card terms lately? As Chuck Jaffe writes, lenders are devising all sorts of new ways to extract dollars from your wallet -- even after the new consumer-friendly law goes into effect Feb. 22.

Here's a fun one: Some lenders use "pick-a-rate" pricing, so the underlying index on which your variable rate is based itself varies. That way, the lender can pick whichever underlying rate best suits the company at any given time. Rates go up, you pay. Rates go down, you keep on paying.

Yet another reason to be really careful when dealing with credit-card debt. And IRA conversions. And just about anything to do with your money.

-- Andrea Coombes, assistant personal finance editor

P.S. Yesterday I said home builders, back in boom times, should have gone against the pack and started building smaller homes before the housing-market crash. Turns out, some of them were doing just that -- read our story today on how home sizes have been shrinking for a couple of years now: Builder, buyers embrace smaller homes.

CONSUMERS Credit-card issuers find creative ways to skirt new law

Between now and Feb. 22 when the new credit-card rules go into effect, you'll see a lot of excited media types talking about all of the good to come out of those regulations, but as a consumer you should worry about what's still on the menu. The card issuers have been cooking up all kinds of new things that their bottom line will find appetizing, but that may make you sick. See Chuck Jaffe.

Down, but not out, in Brooklyn: a daughter's story

When our then-22-year-old daughter told us in the fall of 2008 that she intended to move out of our house and live in New York City on her own, we told her it would be tough. She didn't believe us. Mariana proved us wrong. She not only lived in New York on a salary of less than $30,000 from a publishing-industry job, she managed to save $5,000 over the course of a year. On top of that, she stashed about $1,000 in her 401(k) account. See full story.

RETIREMENT 12 traps to avoid when converting to a Roth IRA

If the high number of phone calls to mutual-fund firms and the comments posted to articles on the subject are any sign, savers are showing a lot of interest in converting their traditional IRAs into Roth IRAs, but they should be wary about acting on that desire too hastily because some expensive traps are waiting for the ill-informed. See Robert Powell.

REAL ESTATE Homeowner renovations set to pick up, but forecaster sees bottom in 2010

Remodeling activity by U.S. homeowners, which has fallen more than 30% from its peak in 2007, is set to pick up again this year as the recession loosens its grip and home sales continue to rebound, according to a remodeling-market indicator released Thursday. See full story.

Home sizes fall as builders, buyers embrace economic reality

New-home buyers responded to the tough times in 2009 by opting for smaller houses, driving down the average size of a house built in the U pay day loan lenders.S. for the first time in 27 years. Data released Wednesday by the National Association of Home Builders found the average size of a new home fell to 2,480 square feet last year from 2,520 square feet in 2008. The last time the average home size fell was 1982. See full story.

FHA raises fees, tightens mortgage underwriting

The Federal Housing Administration said Wednesday that it would raise down-payment requirements, boost its mortgage-insurance premiums and tighten its loan underwriting practices in a bid to strengthen its capital reserves and remain solvent in the face of rising foreclosures and delinquencies. See full story.

Mortgage rates fall: Freddie Mac

The average rate on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages slipped below 5% this week, following bond yields lower for the third week in a row, Freddie Mac's chief economist said on Thursday. See Mortgages.

INVESTING Was it Obama, Philly, Fed or China?

U.S. stocks fell sharply Thursday. Why the sudden drop? Read MarketWatch's new blog, Market Junkie.

Can the lost decade be found again?

More stocks are making the hard climb to the top. Mark Hulbert explores what that means in this edition of the Hulbert Financial Files. Plus, the editor of the Hulbert Financial Digest searches the lost and found for the truth about Wall Street's "lost decade." Listen to Audio Report.

TECHNOLOGY Microsoft issues patch for flaw used in Google attack

After scrambling for days under intense scrutiny, Microsoft Corp. has issued a patch for a flaw used in its Internet browser technology thought to have been used in recent cyber-attacks on Google Inc. and other companies. See full story.

ECONOMY & POLITICS Obama proposes new limits on banks' risky trading

In his toughest response yet to the financial crisis, President Barack Obama proposed Thursday that strict limits be imposed on the size and trading activities of the nation's biggest banks. See full story.

Goldman cuts compensation after facing bonus heat

Goldman Sachs Group Inc., a prime target of the backlash after the financial bailout, on Thursday said it cut a key compensation benchmark to the lowest level in its history as it tries to soften criticism over fat bonuses. See full story.

Jobless claims surge in latest week

First-time claims for state unemployment benefits jumped unexpectedly by the largest amount in eight months, but government statisticians said special factors might have fueled the increase. The number of initial claims in the week ending Jan. 16 rose 36,000 to 482,000, the Labor Department said. See Economic Report.

Supreme Court rolls back spending limits

Overturning a two-decade-old rule, the Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that corporations can spend money to support or oppose candidates in federal campaigns. See full story.

Commentary: Great news! Corporate money's back in politics

Just when the Democrats thought their election prospects couldn't get any worse, the Supreme Court goes and rules that corporate money can come rushing back into campaign finance. See full story.

House can't pass Senate bill, Pelosi says

In a troubling new development for the White House and Democrats, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Thursday said that she doesn't have the votes to pass the Senate's health-care bill.

Personal Finance Daily: From IRAs to credit cards, proceed with caution

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

London Markets: British stocks fall as miners drop

LONDON (MarketWatch) -- Miners retreated on Wednesday following speculation that policy tightening from China will decrease demand for metals, with the move weighing on the top British share index.

Copper miners were hard-hit, as shares of Eurasian Natural Resources fell 5.7%, Antofagasta shares declined 6% and Xstrata shares declined 6.2%.

High-grade-copper futures fell 8 cents to $2.18 a pound, while gold futures dropped $24.20 to $1,115.80 an ounce. The dollar rose against the euro and sterling, with the pound down 0.3% at $1.6304.

"Concerns about imminent policy tightening from Beijing appear to have contributed to the dollar rally," noted strategists at RBC Capital Markets. Read China economy preview.

China has already raised its reserve-requirement rate and reportedly told several commercial banks to stop lending during January on Wednesday. China's top banking regulator, Liu Mingkang, denied the report, but said Chinese banks were expected issue fewer new loans in 2010 than they did in 2009. Read more on China lending.

"This should be welcomed in principle," said Mike Lenhoff, strategist at Brewin Dolphin. "Markets have been prepared to accept that they're not out to kill the economy but are out to control growth. The surprise is that it's come sooner rather than later."

He said it's no coincidence that miners were weak on Wednesday. "They are the one sector that is exclusively geared to the region. The thrust of Chinese policy has been geared to developing domestic demand. That that has benefitted the resource sector."

The U.K. faced its own interest-rate-rise speculation on Tuesday after inflation spiked in December. However, Bank of England policy makers on Wednesday expressed confidence that inflation would remain under control over the long term. Read more on the BoE.

Overall, the U.K. FTSE 100 index dropped 1.3% to 5,440.31. Other European shares were also lower, and U.S. stocks started with losses.

Global Dow

• MarketWatch Topics: The Dubai Crisis • Asia Markets | Europe Markets | LatAm Markets • Canadian Markets | Israel Stocks | London • U cash advance no faxing.S.: Market Snapshot | After Hours • Latin American/Canadian indexes • European indexes | Asian indexes • Bond Report | Oil News | Earnings Watch • Currencies | U.S. Economic Calendar

Stocks jumped on Tuesday on both sides of the Atlantic, led by gains for drugmakers ahead of the U.S. Senate election in Massachusetts. Republican Scott Brown, who won Tuesday night, has promised to help block the Obama Administration's health-care-reform efforts. See related story.

"Pharma stocks outperformed the markets by 130% over five years, the last time U.S. health-care reforms failed. If reforms fail now, pharma stocks should benefit as an overhang is lifted," said analysts at UBS. Drugmakers gaining again on Wednesday included GlaxoSmithKline , up 0.3%.

Shire shares climbed 2.9% after the firm was lifted to overweight from neutral by J.P. Morgan on the pharmaceutical's Intuniv non-stimulant ADHD therapy. The broker now expects its market share to reach 5%, from an earlier view of 3%.

Meanwhile, telecommunications company Cable & Wireless gained 1.9% after it was upgraded to buy from hold at Citigroup, which said that the structural and macroeconomic recovery in 2010 should raise confidence and drive a re-rating of the stock.

Other gainers included bookmaker William Hill , which jumped 4.4% outside the top index. It said fourth-quarter revenue rose 6% and it now expects its fiscal-year net revenue to increase by around 4% from the previous year. Earnings before interest and tax are seen at around 250 million pounds in the year.

Shares of electrical-products retailer Kesa Electricals fell 3.7%.

A 3.9% drop in comparable sales at its Comet chain in the U.K. meant that overall comparable sales fell 0.3% in the period from Nov. 1 to Jan. 8, the firm said, adding that profit margins were flat. Total sales rose 1.3%.

"The stock remains highly rated, on 20.1 times fiscal-year 2010 estimated earnings," though the dividend yield is 3.4%, noted analysts at Seymour Pierce.

London Markets: British stocks fall as miners drop

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Frances Carrefour set for India deal: report

NEW DELHI (AFP) – French supermarket group Carrefour, the world's second largest retailer, is close to a deal that will finally see it set up franchise stores in India, a report said Wednesday.

The French group has been looking for a partnership in India for years and was first reported to be in talks with Indian group Future Value Retail, a unit of Pantaloon Retail, in January last year.

The Economic Times reported Tuesday that the two companies were now "close to deal" that would soon be formally announced.

A tie-up would follow similar alliances between India's Bharti telecoms group and US Wal-Mart and the Indian tea-to-steel Tata Group and Britain?s Tesco.

Future Value Retail owns supermarket chains Big Bazaar and Food Bazaar payday loans.

The Carrefour franchises would be aimed at affluent customers in cities, the newspaper said.

Under India's tight foreign investment rules, no overseas chains are permitted in the retail sector -- except for single-brand outlets such as Nokia or Reebok -- to protect local retail players.

Foreign groups such as Wal-Mart or Carrefour can only be wholesalers and must partner with domestic companies to enter the retail market, valued at 400 billion dollars and forecast to grow rapidly in the coming years.

France's Carrefour set for India deal: report

Hot News: Chinas latest yield hike may signal tightening

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Camargo told to make Cimpor counterbid or withdraw

LISBON (Reuters) – Brazil's Camargo Correa Group must present a counterbid to take over cement maker Cimpor (CPR.LS) or withdraw its merger proposal, Portugal's stock market regulator (CMVM) told the company on Saturday.

Camargo Correa -- a civil construction and real estate conglomerate -- on Wednesday offered to merge its cement business with Cimpor and buy a stake of between 15 and 25 percent in Portugal's largest cement maker.

Cimpor is the target of a takeover offer by Brazil's CSN (CSNA3.SA).

CMVM said in a statement it "notified Camargo Correa that it started an administrative process with the purpose of making the latter comply its proposed merger with the rules on counterbids ... or withdraw it."

It said Camargo has 10 days to reply to the demand.

A counterbid has to target at least the same stake as in the initial takeover bid and be at least 2 percent higher than the initial offer under CMVM rules.

CSN is seeking to buy at least 50 percent of Cimpor plus one share at 5 credit scores for free.75 euros a share.

Cimpor's board of directors had rejected the bid by steelmaker CSN as hostile and low before Camargo's offer, but CSN said it continued to seek a deal with Cimpor shareholders. Analysts expect CSN to sweeten its initial offer, which valued the Portuguese company at about 3.86 billion euros ($5.57 billion).

After Camargo's offer, CSN complained that Camargo was trying to obtain control of Cimpor under more favorable conditions than those a proper counterbid would have entailed.

Cimpor shares, which ended practically flat on Friday at 6.37 euros and shed just around 1 percent during the week, still trade well above the price offered by CSN as traders expect CSN or its rival to offer more.

(Reporting by Andrei Khalip; editing by Patrick Graham)

Camargo told to make Cimpor counterbid or withdraw

Friday, January 15, 2010

Economy worries cap equity gains

LONDON (Reuters) – Persistent worries over the world economy, fueled by tepid U.S. data and a relatively lackluster start to the earnings season, kept a lid on equity gains on Friday, boosting safe-haven trades like the dollar and yen.

Growing jitters over the struggling Greek economy are weighing on the euro zone, with the single currency down almost one percent versus the dollar while the uncertain U.S. economic picture saw oil prices falling for the fifth day in a row.

Upbeat earnings from chipmaker Intel Corp (INTC.O) gave an initial leg-up to share prices -- with Asian tech-heavy bourses like Seoul seeing strong gains -- but the momentum petered out as doubts about the strength of the U.S. recovery weighed.

By 0930 GMT, world stocks (.MIWD00000PUS) were just above flat, staying off 15-month highs hit earlier in the week. Earlier Japan's Nikkei (.N225) closed at a 15-month high, thanks to gains for tech firms like chipmaker Tokyo Electron (8035.T).

European stock markets opened firmer on back of the Intel results, extending their winning streak to three sessions.

The FTSEurofirst (.FTEU3) index of top European shares rose 0.6 percent, with banks accounting for most of the gains. HSBC (HSBA.L), Santander (SAN.MC) and Deutsche (DBKGn.DE) rose up to 1.4 percent on hopes of good news from investment bank JPMorgan (JPM.N) when it reports fourth quarter earnings at 1200 GMT.

"Results will dominate the newsflow and I would expect good numbers, but there will be little share price reaction unless companies increase expectations for the outlook, which they have little incentive to do," said Lars Kreckel, strategist at Exane BNP Paribas in London.

Reflecting these worries, U.S. stock futures slipped 0.2 percent. Wall Street closed only marginally higher on Thursday, weighed down by weak U.S. retail sales data and a rise in jobless claims quick payday loans.

Corporate earnings alone will not lift markets for long, said Geoff Lewis, head of investment services at JP Morgan Asset Management in Hong Kong.

"You still have to see continued good news on the economic front to validate improvements in corporate earnings forecasts," said. "Markets will want to see evidence of strength in private sector demand ... it's important the economy stand on its feet after the public fiscal stimulus starts to fade."

Investors now await U.S. CPI and manufacturing data due at 1330 GMT and 1415 GMT respectively.

DOLLAR, YEN, BONDS GAIN

With investors reluctant to take on too much risk, the U.S. dollar (.DXY) and yen rose.

Against a currency basket, the dollar (.DXY) rose half a percent to 77.115 but against the yen it fell 0.4 percent to 90.66 yen, its lowest in nearly four weeks.

The euro traded at a four-week low versus yen, down 1.2 percent.

The single currency is taking a hit from Greece. Its weakness has deepened after comments on Thursday by European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet who warned Europe faced a "major debt problem" and that no government could expect "special treatment" from the ECB.

"If we see strong U.S. data later today, the dollar will rise, if it's weak the euro will rise. It's a fairly reactionary market today," said Peter Frank, currency strategist at Societe Generale in London.

U.S. Treasuries were up, soothed by a solid auction of 30-year bills on Thursday.

Oil however weakened and was set for its first weekly drop in more than a month.

(Additional reporting by Naomi Tajitsu and Simon Falush in London; Umesh Desai in Hong Kong, editing by Mike Peacock)

Economy worries cap equity gains

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Tough Confirmation for E.U.’s Ex-Antitrust Chief

BERLIN — With her aggressive antitrust prosecutions, Neelie Kroes, the European Union’s former competition commissioner, should be one of the last officeholders on the Continent who needed to prove her pro-consumer credentials.

But that is exactly what Ms. Kroes, a 68-year-old Dutch economist, is expected to do Thursday when she answers questions from a committee of the European Parliament considering her nomination as commissioner for the bloc’s digital agenda, which includes telecommunications and the Internet.

And despite bringing the technology giants Intel and Microsoft to heel, as well as reining in Europe’s largest energy and asphalt companies, support for Ms. Kroes is not a given.

“I am optimistic Mrs. Kroes will do a good job, but make no mistake, the hearing is not going to be a formality — it will be hot,” said Paul Rübig, an Austrian lawmaker and member of the Industry, Research and Energy Committee, which is holding the confirmation hearing.

Despite her successful five-year tenure, which cemented Europe’s position as the world’s technology regulator, Ms. Kroes remains relatively unknown among many in Parliament, who play no direct role in competition cases and until now have had few dealings with her.

In December, Ms. Kroes met with key lawmakers in Strasbourg but did not divulge her position on issues like copyright protection, expanding the availability of broadband, the use of E.U. broadcast spectrum for the mobile Internet and price limits on voice and data roaming charges, which were championed and passed by the previous telecom commissioner, Viviane Reding.

Through a spokesman, Ms. Kroes declined an interview before the hearing.

Although she proved a formidable administrator in her largely executive role as competition commissioner, in her new post Ms. Kroes will have to prove that she has the negotiating skills needed to win support for her initiatives from Parliament and the other commissioners.

Ms. Kroes is a member of the European Liberal Democratic Alliance, a party that makes up only 11 percent of Parliament, which is dominated by the conservative and socialist blocs. Though her own Dutch party, the People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy, is in opposition in the Netherlands, her country’s governing coalition, recognizing her seniority and established clout, recommended her for a second term as commissioner in Brussels.

Most are betting that Ms. Kroes’s record as a tough, determined negotiator willing to levy big fines and penalties against companies like Microsoft and Intel will win her the post.

“She has an extremely good reputation for defending the internal markets,” said Lena Ek, a Swedish member of the parliamentary committee considering the nomination and also a Liberal Democrat. “We all know Mrs. Kroes is a tough lady. She took on the fight with Microsoft. Her nomination is not controversial.”

But reputation alone will not ensure Ms. Kroes a smooth hearing given the pro-consumer bias of Parliament, whose members overwhelmingly supported Ms. Reding on controversial changes like placing limits on mobile phone roaming charges and creating an E.U.-wide telecommunications regulator.

Ms. Kroes, a market centrist who opposed consumer price caps on roaming — she said wholesale limits, or limits on the charges operators impose on each other using each other’s networks, should have been attempted first — has held seats on the boards of more than 20 global companies, including the telecom operator O2 and a subsidiary of the network equipment maker Alcatel-Lucent.

Some are watching to see whether Ms. Kroes will be as willing as Ms. Reding to intervene for consumers.

“She has a very strong background in enforcing competition rules against dominant firms,” said Ilsa Godlovitch, the legislative affairs director of ECTA, a Brussels association that represents smaller telecommunications companies cheap business cards. “Her big challenge over next five years will be to show the same determination and strength in making sure these kinds of abuses don’t happen in the first place.”

But lawmakers and others who have worked closely with Ms. Kroes during her tenure as competition commissioner said she would not hesitate to intervene on behalf of consumers.

“Mrs. Kroes has no trouble taking decisions,” said Thomas Vinje, a competition lawyer in Brussels at Clifford Chance who defended the complainants in cases against Microsoft. “She has been a strong advocate of the single market. She has common sense, is very politically savvy and is a good deal-maker, knowing how far she can push people to their political limits.”

Mr. Vinje described Ms. Kroes as a hard-charging pragmatist who often spent more than 12 hours a day in her Brussels office. The decor of her office is cooly elegant, Mr. Vinje said, devoid of the usual photographs of herself as commissioner and decorated only with large works of modern art.

One of Ms. Kroes’s favorite questions to visitors, according to Mr. Vinje, is: “What would you do if you were me?” She has an inclusive working style, Mr. Vinje said, and likes to attends meetings with as many as four staff members, whom she often lets direct questioning.

As competition commissioner, Ms. Kroes held meetings in Brussels with global celebrities like the Apple chief executive, Steven P. Jobs, and Mick Jagger of the Rolling Stones, in the course of inquiries into hurdles that domestic copyright laws presented in the purchase of online music.

Monique Goyens, director general of the European Consumers’ Organization, a group in Brussels representing consumer advocates, said Ms. Kroes fought hard during her first term for legislation that would have given E.U. citizens the right to collectively sue corporate cartels in class-action suits.

Despite Ms. Kroes’s efforts the measure stalled in the commission.

“Mrs Kroes has been an outspoken, consumer-friendly commissioner,” Ms. Goyens said.

Michael Bartholomew, the director of the European Telecommunications Network Operators’ Association, said Ms. Kroes might ultimately be more industry-friendly than Ms. Reding. Ms. Kroes, he noted, opposed Ms. Reding’s ultimately successful attempt to give E.U. countries the legal ability to require their former telecom monopolies to pay for access to the fixed line networks they created to spur competition.

“She opposed the remedy of functional separation, and seems to favor market forces taking precedence over regulation,” Mr. Bartholomew said.

Whatever direction she chooses, Ms. Kroes will have plenty of issues to choose from. Those include a rewrite of Europe’s electronic copyright laws, which could affect Google’s plan to digitize the world’s books; redeployment of national broadcast frequencies for an E.U. mobile broadband network; fixing the terms of access for competitors to access high-speed fiber-optic data networks; and the further opening of Europe’s national telecom markets, some of which, like those in Germany and Spain, are still partially dominated by former monopolies.

In a speech in June 2008 in Brussels to OpenForum Europe, a group that advocates the use of open-source software, Ms. Kroes outlined her general approach to technology regulation.

“If markets are not delivering as they should, then I want to understand the problems, and find solutions,” she said in the speech. “That may mean enforcement, advocacy, or specific commission or national government policy initiatives. In technology markets, I think it means all three.”

Tough Confirmation for E.U.’s Ex-Antitrust Chief

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Sears names new retail executive

HOFFMAN ESTATES, Ill. – Sears Holdings Corp. said it hired a former Wal-Mart executive to lead its retail services division, overseeing growth at the company's stores.

James H. Haworth will join the owner of Sears and Kmart stores as an executive vice president and president of the company's retail services unit.

Haworth was most recently chairman, president and CEO of Chia Tai Enterprises International Limited & CP Lotus, a holding company that operated shopping centers in China. He also founded a consulting firm online cash advances.

Before that, Haworth spent two decades with Wal-Mart Stores Inc., ending as chief operating officer and executive vice president of operations for the Sam's Club unit.

At Sears Holding, Haworth replaces Kevin Holt, who is leaving the suburban Chicago retailer.

Haworth will begin work Jan. 31.

Sears Holdings is led by hedge fund financier Edward Lampert.

Sears names new retail executive

Monday, January 11, 2010

After positive start, Wall Street eyes retail data, earnings

NEW YORK (AFP) – Wall Street opened 2010 riding momentum from last year's strong rally even as doubts emerge about the market in view of an uncertain pace of recovery from the brutal recession.

In the coming week, the focus turns to the health of the American consumer with data on retail sales for December, offering clues on spending which accounts for two-thirds of economic activity.

Also affecting trade will be the start of corporate earnings season with Alcoa the first of the major blue-chip firms to release financial results from the fourth quarter.

In the week to Friday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average of blue chips gained 1.82 percent to 10,618.19, its best level in 15 months as the market was able to shake off a disappointing report showing ongoing US job losses.

The tech-dominated Nasdaq composite advanced 2.12 percent for the week to 2,317.17 and the broad Standard & Poor's 500 index climbed 2.68 percent to 1,144.98.

The positive start for 2010 came after a dramatic rebound last year that lifted the Dow by 18.82 percent, with the Nasdaq up 43.9 percent and the S&P 500 index rising 23.5 percent.

Some analysts say the rally still has legs even after the sizzling gains since lows of last March.

David Kotok, chief investment officer at Cumberland Advisors, said he sees the uptrend in place even if there is a "corrective selloff" sometime this year.

"Stocks still have room to go higher before this bull market is over," he said.

"Productivity and profits will be unusually high coming out of this post-crisis recession. We expect the US stock market to close the 'Lehman gap.' That could bring stocks to the pre-Lehman (Brothers) failure (of 2008) level of over 1,250 on the S&P 500 index."

But some of the optimism about a recovery for the economy and the market were dampened by Friday's report showing a further loss of 85,000 jobs with the unemployment rate holding at 10 percent.

The data "shows that the labor market recovery is anemic," said Aaron Smith at Moody's Economy.com.

"Until confidence is restored, the labor market recovery will be gradual and uneven. Although layoffs are slowing, the poor hiring environment should remind policymakers that they need to continue to support the job market payday loan online."

The US economy is growing but mainly due to gains in manufacturing as companies ramp up to replace inventories after a big drawdown.

Dean Maki at Barclays Capital said a key to the recovery "is how households respond to the additional labor income generated by the production rebound."

"If consumers respond by raising their spending, the recovery will likely become self-sustaining, as production rises further in response to sales gains, generating additional income, and so on."

With this in mind, the key report for the coming week will likely be Thursday's data on US retail sales for December, which includes the crucial holiday season.

"All eyes will be on December's retail sales figures," said Meny Grauman at CIBC World Markets.

"Despite the fact that unemployment is close to a 27-year high, consumer spending has been surprisingly resilient in the early stages of this recovery. We agree that sales likely closed the year by posting another monthly gain, but expect household spending to lose steam later in 2010."

On the corporate front, Alcoa's earnings Monday will be followed by one from banking giant JPMorgan Chase on Friday, ahead of a flood of results in the following weeks.

David Rosenberg at Glusking Sheff & Associates said the market is too optimistic about earnings in light of a sputtering economy.

"Most economic forecasters see nominal (economic) growth at 4.0 percent for this year. But strategists see, on average, 36 percent profit growth," he said.

He argued that the economic growth "is only enough to boost profits by 10 percent if the normal relationship holds up."

Bonds ended the week mixed. The yield on the 10-year Treasury bond eased to 3.808 percent from 3.843 percent a week earlier and that on the 30-year bond rose to 4.695 percent against 4.641 percent. Bond yields and prices move in opposite directions.

After positive start, Wall Street eyes retail data, earnings

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Economic View: Of Individual Liberty and Cap and Trade

SOME people oppose measures to limit greenhouse gases because they believe that global warming is a myth. These denialists may have a little extra spring in their step during the current cold snap, but their influence has been steadily waning.

The biggest remaining obstacle is disagreement over the legitimacy of proposed solutions. At the heart of attempts to curb carbon dioxide emissions are two related proposals: taxation of those emissions and a system of tradable emission permits, also known as cap and trade. Both have been attacked as unacceptable restrictions on individual liberty. The attacks have come from both sides of the political aisle, but have been pressed with particular insistence by conservatives and libertarians.

It’s a puzzling objection, because both proposals are squarely consistent with the framework advocated by conservatives’ patron saint regarding matters related to private actions that harm others. That would be Ronald H. Coase, professor emeritus at the University of Chicago and the 1991 Nobel laureate in economics, who will turn 100 this year.

Mr. Coase (the name rhymes with “dose”) summarized his framework in a 1960 paper titled “The Problem of Social Cost,” which has become one of the most-often-cited economics papers ever published. He stressed that actions with harmful side effects — negative externalities, in economists’ parlance — are quintessentially practical problems. They are best solved, he argued, not by chanting slogans about rights and freedoms, but by steering mitigation efforts to those who can perform them most efficiently.

The pre-Coase tradition was to view externalities in terms of perpetrators and victims. The owner of a factory that emitted smoke was a perpetrator, for example, and those who were harmed by it were victims. The conventional view was that perpetrators should be restrained from harming victims.

Mr. Coase’s profound insight was that this view ignored the inherently reciprocal nature of externalities. Smoke harms others, yes. But preventing smoke causes harm, too, because smokestack filters are costly. Our shared interest, he reasoned, was to use the least costly means of reducing the relevant damage.

In some cases, that might involve filtering out much of the smoke. But in others, the cheapest solution might be for parties downwind to relocate. Mr. Coase argued that whenever it was practical for affected parties to forge private agreements among themselves, they would have strong incentive to use the least costly solution to the problem.

His paper provoked a firestorm of criticism, based on the impression that he was claiming that government didn’t need to regulate activities that cause harm to others. As a closer reading makes clear, however, this could not have been his view, especially with respect to activities like global pollution.

Some pollution damage is localized. But when it comes to global warming, people cannot escape damage by simply moving upwind. Because of the wide variety of activities involved and the large number of people affected, there is no practical way to negotiate private solutions low interest rate personal loans. In such cases, Mr. Coase suggested, government regulators should try to mimic solutions that people would have adopted on their own if negotiations had been practical.

Climate scientists agree that the cheapest way to combat global warming is to curb carbon dioxide emissions. And economists agree that the cheapest way to do that is by changing emitters’ incentives, either by taxing emissions or requiring emission permits.

I chatted with Mr. Coase briefly last week, and he is still following these issues. He agreed that both taxes and tradable permits satisfy his criterion of concentrating damage abatement with those who can accomplish it at least cost. Those with inexpensive ways of reducing emissions will find it attractive to adopt them, thus avoiding carbon dioxide taxes or the need to purchase costly permits. Others will find it cheaper to pay taxes or buy permits.

Although both proposals pass muster within the Coase framework, conservatives remain almost unanimously opposed to the cap-and-trade proposal approved last year in the House and currently under discussion in the Senate. Much of this opposition is rooted in a passionate distaste for “social engineering,” which, according to the conservative columnist Henry Lamb, “always ends in disaster.”

But social engineering is just another term for collective action to change individual incentives. And unconditional rejection of such action is flatly inconsistent with the Coase framework that conservatives have justifiably celebrated.

According to Conservapedia.com, an online encyclopedia with a conservative orientation, Mr. Coase’s “extraordinary insight was that the free market always reaches the most efficient level of productive activity, in the absence of transaction costs.” Maybe, but as Mr. Coase himself also recognized, transaction costs are often prohibitive, and in such cases all bets regarding free-market efficiency are off. When negotiation is impractical, collective action can often improve matters.

In the case of global warming, markets fail because we don’t take into account the costs that our carbon dioxide emissions impose on others. The least intrusive way to have us weigh those costs is by taxing emissions, or by requiring tradable emissions permits. Either step would move us closer to the conservative/libertarian gold standard — namely, the outcome we’d see if there were perfect information and no obstacles to free exchange.

The Conservapedia.com entry on Mr. Coase continues, “To this day, liberals fail to give him the recognition he earned.” A fair point, perhaps. But while Mr. Coase has often been skeptical of government intervention, he is no ideologue. Conservatives, too, have sold him short.

Robert H. Frank is an economics professor at the Johnson Graduate School of Management at Cornell University.

Economic View: Of Individual Liberty and Cap and Trade

Friday, January 8, 2010

GM not hopeful on Saab deal, proceeds with closure

DETROIT (Reuters) – General Motors Co (GM.UL) Chief Executive Ed Whitacre said on Wednesday he is not hopeful a breakthrough deal can be reached to save Saab and said GM is proceeding with the wind-down of the Swedish brand.

Whitacre, speaking to reporters at the company's headquarters, also said GM's new chief financial officer Chris Liddell, who has joined from Microsoft Corp (MSFT.O), could be a candidate for permanent chief executive of the automaker.

Whitacre, who became acting CEO in December following the departure of Fritz Henderson in a split with the board, said he has yet to receive a list of potential CEO candidates.

"I would say he (Liddell) certainly could be a candidate. It would be up to the board and his performance," Whitacre said.

Whitacre predicted the No. 1 U.S. automaker will return to profitability this year, after losing $88 billion since 2005 through the first quarter of last year. GM filed for bankruptcy on June 1.

GM is dropping Pontiac, Saturn and Saab and selling Hummer as it restructures to return to profitability after emerging from its U.S. government-funded bankruptcy in July.

He said none of the potential bidders for Saab have come forward with the financing needed to restructure the money-losing automaker.

"I think we've done everything humanly possible," Whitacre said, adding GM will start closing down Saab plants later this week paydayloans.

Dutch luxury carmaker Spyker Cars (SPYKR.AS) is among possible bidders for Saab, but analysts have said the question of how to fund an acquisition of the brand is a major hurdle to a deal. Spyker Chief Executive Victor Muller said last week GM had set a Thursday deadline for bids.

Dropping the 60-year-old Swedish auto brand would eliminate 3,400 jobs in Sweden and hit 1,100 Saab dealers globally.

Separately, Whitacre said GM aims to close a deal to sell the Hummer SUV brand to China's Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery by the end of January. GM reached a tentative deal with Tengzhong to sell Hummer in June.

In wide-ranging remarks, Whitacre said he expects "hundreds" of U.S. dealers terminated as part of its bankruptcy restructuring to be reinstated. Congress passed a bill in December that gives terminated GM and Chrysler dealers the right to negotiate with the companies to maintain their franchise agreements.

GM, which had about 6,200 U.S. dealers before bankruptcy, is terminating franchise agreements with more than 1,300 dealers through the end of October.

(Reporting by Soyoung Kim; Editing by Tim Dobbyn and Matthew Lewis)

GM not hopeful on Saab deal, proceeds with closure

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Homebuilder Lennar posts profit, shares rise

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Homebuilder Lennar Corp (LEN.N) posted its first quarterly profit in almost three years, helped mainly by a tax benefit, and shares rose 6 percent in premarket trading.

The company, one of the five largest in the United States, reported earnings of $35.6 million, or 19 cents per share, for the fourth quarter ended November 30, compared with a loss of $811 million, or $5.12 per share, a year ago. Revenue fell 29 percent to $913.7 million. It last made a quarterly profit in the first quarter of 2007.

Miami-based Lennar's results included a tax benefit of $1.34 per share related to a federal tax provision that allows companies to apply losses to prior income. They also contained 89 cents per share in charges on land that has lost value.

Wall Street expected a loss of 48 cents a share, before special items, on revenue of $862 payday loans online.7 million, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S. Thomson Reuters could not immediately confirm whether the results compared directly with estimates.

Lennar's results reflect a summer and fall during which homebuilders enjoyed a respite from the housing slump. Emboldened by a federal tax credit, historically low interest rates and lower home prices, buyers plunged into the market, enabling several builders, including Lennar, to post order increases. Lennar's orders increased by 3 percent, its first year-over-year increase since the first quarter of 2006.

Lennar's shares were up about 6 percent to $14.50 in premarket trading.

(Reporting by Helen Chernikoff and Bijoy Koyitty, editing by Dave Zimmerman)

Homebuilder Lennar posts profit, shares rise

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

3 U.S automakers report double-digit sales drops

CHICAGO, Jan. 5 (Xinhua) -- The three big automakers of the United States reported on Tuesday double-digit sales drops for 2009, the worst year for U.S. auto sales in nearly 30 years.

General Motors reported sales of 2,084,492 vehicles in 2009, off 30 percent from the previous year. Its December sales were down 6 percent compared with the previous month.

"The year-over-year comparison reflects a 38-percent reduction in fleet, reduced overall incentive spending and the orderly wind-down of the Pontiac and Saturn brands," said Susan Docherty, GM vice president, U.S. Sales.

Chrysler had its worst sales year in 47 years in 2009 as it sold just over 931,000 cars and trucks in the year allstate insurance company.

The struggling automaker says its sales fell 36 percent compared with 2008 as the company received government aid and worked through bankruptcy protection.

Ford reported sales of 1,682,323 vehicles in 2009, a 15.4-percent decrease compared with the previous year.

However, Ford ended the year with a bang, with December sales up 33 percent. The automaker says it gained U.S. market share for the year for the first time since 1995.

3 U.S automakers report double-digit sales drops

Monday, January 4, 2010

Credit Suisse sued over resorts, $24 billion sought

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Credit Suisse Group AG (CSGN.VX) has been sued by property owners in four luxury ski and golf resorts, saying the Swiss bank concocted a loan scheme to defraud them and ultimately take over the properties.

The lawsuit filed on Sunday in federal court in Boise, Idaho, seeks $24 billion of damages against Credit Suisse and commercial real estate firm Cushman & Wakefield Inc, and class-action status for more than 3,000 investors who bought land or homes.

The alleged losses relate to Yellowstone Club, a Montana ski resort whose members have included Microsoft Corp (MSFT.O) Chairman Bill Gates, as well as to Lake Las Vegas resort in southern Nevada, the Tamarack resort in central Idaho and Ginn sur Mer on Grand Bahama Island in the Bahamas.

Lake Las Vegas and Tamarack have also been the subject of bankruptcy proceedings, court records show. The four resorts are among many high-end properties that have struggled with falling real estate values and the credit crisis.

Credit Suisse spokesman Duncan King said: "We believe the suit to be without merit and will defend ourselves vigorously." Cushman & Wakefield spokesman Dwayne Doherty declined to comment, saying the firm had not reviewed the lawsuit.

Robert Huntley, an Idaho lawyer representing the plaintiffs, did not immediately return calls seeking a comment.

According to the complaint, Credit Suisse violated federal racketeering laws by concocting a "loan to own" scheme that inflated the value of resorts and burdened the resorts and purchasers of homes there with too much debt.

Using appraisal methods provided by Cushman & Wakefield, this scheme allowed Credit Suisse to win "enormous fees" and ultimately foreclose on or take control of the resorts at well below market value, the complaint said banks issue payday loans.

"The scheme has been a financial heist for Credit Suisse with no risk," the complaint said.

"Credit Suisse knew at the time the lending advice and authorizations were given that its scheme and tactics would cause the developers and the resorts financial ruin, resulting in the ultimate takeover by Credit Suisse," it added.

The complaint seeks $8 billion of actual damages, including alleged losses of property, business interests and reputation, plus $16 billion of punitive damages.

Beau Blixseth, one of the plaintiffs, is suing for losses on his property at Yellowstone, which was developed by his father Tim, a timber baron and former billionaire. Yellowstone borrowed $375 million from Credit Suisse in 2005.

The other plaintiff, L.J. Gibson, owns property at the other three resorts, the complaint said.

Last May, a federal judge overseeing Yellowstone's bankruptcy faulted Credit Suisse in an interim order for "predatory lending practices" that he said caused "financial ruin" for several resorts.

"The naked greed in this case," U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Ralph Kirscher wrote, "shocks the conscience of this court." The judge later approved the sale of Yellowstone to CrossHarbor Capital Partners LLC.

Yellowstone filed for bankruptcy in November 2008, three months after Edra Blixseth, who had been married to Tim Blixseth, gained control of the resort in divorce proceedings.

The case is Gibson et al v. Credit Suisse AG et al, U.S. District Court, District of Idaho, No. 10-00001.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel; editing by Dave Zimmerman and Tim Dobbyn)

Credit Suisse sued over resorts, $24 billion sought

Sunday, January 3, 2010

The Fed: Low rates didnt cause bubble, Bernanke says

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - The Federal Reserve had a role in inflating the housing bubble, but it wasn't low interest rates in the U.S. that fueled speculation in housing around the globe, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said Sunday.

Rather, it was lax supervision of toxic mortgages by the Fed and other bank regulators -- along with excessive flows of capital around the globe -- that inflated the bubble, setting up the world economy for what may have been the worst economic crisis in modern history, Bernanke said. Read full text of his speech.

News Hub: 2010 Market Preview

WSJ's Matt Phillips joins the News Hub with a look at what investors can expect from the market in 2010.

In twin speeches at the annual meeting of the American Economic Association in Atlanta, Ga., Bernanke and his vice chairman, Donald Kohn, responded to critics who suggest that the Fed's policy of very low interest rates from 2001 to 2005 was the major cause of the housing bubble.

"The magnitude of house-price gains seems too large to be readily explainable by the stance of monetary policy alone," Bernanke concluded in his speech. Comparisons with other major economies shows that countries with relatively higher interest rates had larger housing bubbles, he said.

Bernanke conducted a kind of post-mortem on the housing bubble. Using historic relationships, he concluded that low interest rates were responsible for about 5% of the change in housing prices, while greater global capital flows explained about 30% of the change.

The biggest cause of the bubble was exotic mortgages and the decline in underwriting standards, he said. Buyers were able to lower their initial monthly payments, which allowed prices to soar to unsustainable levels.

"Both lenders and borrowers became convinced that house prices would only go up," Bernanke said. "Borrowers chose, and were extended, mortgages that they could not be expected to service in the longer term. They were provided these loans on the expectation that accumulating home equity would soon allow refinancing into more sustainable mortgages. For a time, rising house prices became a self-fulfilling prophecy, but ultimately, further appreciation could not be sustained and house prices collapsed credit reports free."

"That conclusion suggests that the best response to the housing bubble would have been regulatory, not monetary," Bernanke said. "Stronger regulation and supervision aimed at problems with underwriting practices and lenders' risk management would have been a more effective and surgical approach to constraining the housing bubble than a general increase in interest rates."

Bernanke said the Fed and other regulators finally adopted rules to stop the worst practices, but "these efforts came too late or were insufficient to stop the decline in underwriting standards and effectively constrain the housing bubble."

Raising interest rates to stop the bubble would have required the Fed to make a judgment about the sustainability of housing prices, something the central bank has been reluctant to do.

Even if the Fed had decided the bubble should have been deflated earlier, raising rates in 2003 or 2004 "could have seriously weakened the economy at just the time when the recovery from the previous recession was becoming established," Bernanke said.

In his speech, Kohn said raising interest rates now to prevent commodity price bubbles from developing would be ineffective and likely would damage the fragile economic recovery. Read the full text of Kohn's speech.

Kohn said the economy is likely to grow more slowly than its potential for some time, while inflation is likely to be below the Fed's target of 2%.

In this context, "tightening policy to head off a perceived threat of asset price misalignment could be expensive in terms of medium-term economic stability."

"We do not have good theories or empirical evidence to guide policymakers in their efforts to use short-term interest rates to limit financial speculation," Kohn said.

The Fed: Low rates didn't cause bubble, Bernanke says

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Britain ends 2009 as last G20 nation still in recession

PAN style="FONT-FAMILY: ���� mso-ascii-font-family: Verdana; mso-hansi-font-family: Verdana">by Peter Barker LONDON, Jan. 1 (Xinhua) -- The British economy has weathered one of its most turbulent years and has ended 2009 with unemployment lower than expected but still in recession. Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling came to the end of the year with a pre-budget report that forecast modest growth for 2009's fourth quarter, but also predicted a year-on-year decline in GDP of 4.75 percent. As the United States, France and Japan all moved into growth in the third quarter, Britain was officially left as the final G20 nation still in recession. Negative growth has lasted for six straight quarters and is the longest since records began in 1955. Darling predicted a modest return to growth for the fourth quarter of 2009. Several banks -- most notably the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) and Lloyds Group -- were bailed out in 2008, and 2009 saw further aid being extended to them. According to National Audit Office figures, the British government has so far stumped up 117 billion pounds (189 billion U.S. dollars) to rescue its most vulnerable financial performers. Those same performers gearing up to reward themselves with bonuses one year after government bailout caused widespread public anger. Darling reacted by slapping a 50-percent bonus tax on bankers' bonuses above 25,000 pounds (40,400 dollars). He also raised the public sector borrowing requirement for 2009to an historic high of 178 billion pounds (287 billion dollars), and 176 billion pounds (284 billion dollars) for 2010, earning criticism for his failure to be explicit how this spending will be reined in the medium term. In the early part of 2009, the Bank of England (BOE) reduced interest rates to a historic low of 0.5 percent, and has left them there for nine months to boost lending. In addition, it has for the first time used quantitative easing to boost the lending. One year earlier, the British government had slashed VAT, or value added tax, to 15.0 percent in a bid to boost the recession-struck economy and lift consumer spending. However, Darling confirmed last month that VAT would revert back to its pre-recession level of 17.5 percent on Jan. 1. Inflation peaked in May at 2.2 percent, but was on its way backup again with the last available figures in November showing it reached 1.9 percent, pushed by rising fuel prices. The BOE forecast that inflation would go through the 2 percent barrier in 2010. In its final quarterly report of the year, the BOE said the rate of wage increase had slowed and that household incomes were under pressure. The BOE said in its bulletin for the fourth quarter: "An important component of this slower wage growth has been the recent movements in pay settlements. Average pay settlements have fallen sharply over the past year and many companies have imposed pay freezes." "The decline has been broad-based across sectors. The decline in settlements likely reflect both the weakening demand for labor and the sharp falls in official measures of inflation payday loans with no fax." The bank reported that 35 percent of workers saw their pay frozen, but that only 1 percent of workers saw their pay cut. The result is that nearly a third of workers have seen their household income drop by at least 1,200 pounds (1,930 dollars) a year. The unemployment rate remained the same in the three months to October (the last period figures available) as in the previous three-month period at 7.9 percent, said the Office of National Statistics (ONS). This put the total at 2.49 million unemployed, a rise of 608,000 from a year earlier and the highest figure since early 1995, but less than experts had feared. The ONS said that though the number of jobless was still rising, this was the smallest quarterly increase in the number of unemployed since March-May 2008. Latest figures from the ONS showed that industrial production in Britain was unchanged in October from the previous month. Compared with the same month last year, production fell 8.4 percent. Economists had forecast a 0.4-percent monthly rise and a 7.7-percent year-on-year decline. Manufacturing output was also flat in October, recording a 7.8-percent fall from the level seen in October 2008. Economists had forecast a 0.4-percent monthly rise and a 7.2-percent annual fall. Commenting on the manufacturing output figures, David Kern, chief economist at the British Chambers of Commerce, said: "The failure of manufacturing to show any growth in October is disappointing and increases concerns that a return to growth in Q4(the fourth quarter) is not yet guaranteed. All the longer-term comparisons -- both three months and 12 months -- show that manufacturing output is still declining." "A recovery in manufacturing is critical in order to secure the much needed rebalancing of the UK's economy," he said. The housing market has seemingly bounced back from recession more quickly than the other sectors. Nationwide Building Society said on Thursday that the average price of a home was 162,103 pounds (262,000 dollars), up from 153,048 pounds (247,400 dollars) in December 2008. Low interest rates, the re-entry of cash buyers to the market, and a continued lack of homes for sale had all put upward pressure on prices, despite only a modest increase in demand. Martin Gahbauer, Nationwide's chief economist, said: "The average price of a typical UK property has ended the year 5.9 percent higher than at the end of 2008." "Although house prices are still 12.2 percent lower than their October 2007 cyclical peak, they have now rebounded by an impressive 8.9 percent since their February 2009 trough." With a general election due no later than the end of May 2010, the new government will face the immense task of continuing the slow and bumpy turnaround the British economy has experienced in 2009. Special Report: Global Financial Crisis

Britain ends 2009 as last G20 nation still in recession